Mileage Tax and big brother watchful eye: Soini
Home Presentation of CV publications contact appearances in local elections vaalibudjettini 2012 municipal election programs of the 2012 municipal elections program for 2008 to 400 000 in Helsinki following PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2011 Vaalibudjettini machines and other election candidates a couple of good links to the HS my old bike Mediterranean sea eduskuntasivuni
In this chain is intended to discuss only that which is proposed mileage tax impact of data protection point of view, and if that's the problem be avoided. I would argue that the meaning is not very big and it can be avoided.
Let us assume that a mysterious big brother is always able to be informed of all the data that is collected by us to any external register any big brother, and that can therefore be easily adhered to, even in all registers, in response to the information kilometer tax purposes. This is not about me not very significant, as the big brother of us already know pretty much all the things that the registry contains.
Big Brother is to know exactly where on your cell phone is moving, I can work out at our place when we open our facebook or Helsingin Sanomat online version of the locals. In addition, he knows all the shopping, q10 where we have shown the S-discount card or other similar spyware q10 purpose made customer card. Big brother's always recorded in the register when paying for plastic money, and so on. When big brother is all of this information already, it is worth to him to lift a finger to know where our car is, after all, he already knows your cell phone is and has been. Cell phone we have with us always, the car we drive only part of the time. And when talking about a mobile phone, big brother know who we are talking about and from where. The car he knows just how the car is moving, but not by whom it is run and who is in the car.
If desired, the mileage tax is to be done so as not to be a big brother to files other indication as how much we drive. That's what he already knows that we pay for refueling plastic money. q10 Ollila mötikän not have to send out any information q10 other than that, how much of the bill we have achieved. If so decided, the system is built in such a way that the car out to go to other information. If it is determined that no other information not collected, not collected, but if it is desired that the accuracy of the bill it is possible to check whether the device can be stored in the runs inside. 16 GB memory stick is already a retail price of less than ten.
Data protection is based on trust between the people, the fact that the contracts entered into are honored. The previous hour, and the basic human nature of knowing is very hard to believe that no abuse of the system.
And when the technology is installed in the car, then is it not just for political q10 decisions depend on how it is decided to take advantage of at any given matter. How do these political decisions can not predict whether or not required at all?
Instead, you or anyone else a politician can not in any way promise that the next Government. For example, information like that is very easy to use when you just made a decision that they do so.
Yeah autoissahan is just excellent way forward to the measuring equipment, mobile apps, and sensors (= VTI Hamlin Oy, Finland), and GPS to not to fall in other posts, but to inform what kilometritaksalla (= Ollillan vyökykkeellä, either rural = 0, or in the city = 1) journey by car to the taxable journey.
Thus, more masts and base stations to nature and to you. Point masts are at home, measure the mass (= in fact, have already q10 WLAN base stations and handsets in the form of) what homes are made, and will be subjected something that could be taxed. Micro-Soft Just for example, live in the homes of many microphones and cameras in the role (ie, Windows, and Linux both provide q10 these methods).
I've been wondering that why you did not raise the green noise that a significant q10 part of the environmental control is going to take away traffic from taxation. Ollila is honestly concerned about the reduced fuel consumption leads to reduced tax revenue. Kyllonen is then less honest, when not talking about dwindling tax revenues, but "environmental control" (though apparently the sense that the amount to be deducted or added).
What is the problem with the current trend, that car consumption is reduced (whether TSI and Ecoboost engines or electric cars), and a new car purchase is taxed, which provide for progressive taxation, as well as the new car was built, the burden of the environment? If the emissions are reduced and the car tax is controlled by the purchase of new cars in low-emission, which brings improvement in the environmental control of shutdown q10 and the new car price slashing, so that the frugal car being charged to tax in kilometers?
Still exclude why the formula "in the statistics the average consumption of" times "annual mileage" is for you eco-taxed, but the tax on gasoline is not it? Is not [N liters / km] * [km]
Home Presentation of CV publications contact appearances in local elections vaalibudjettini 2012 municipal election programs of the 2012 municipal elections program for 2008 to 400 000 in Helsinki following PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2011 Vaalibudjettini machines and other election candidates a couple of good links to the HS my old bike Mediterranean sea eduskuntasivuni
In this chain is intended to discuss only that which is proposed mileage tax impact of data protection point of view, and if that's the problem be avoided. I would argue that the meaning is not very big and it can be avoided.
Let us assume that a mysterious big brother is always able to be informed of all the data that is collected by us to any external register any big brother, and that can therefore be easily adhered to, even in all registers, in response to the information kilometer tax purposes. This is not about me not very significant, as the big brother of us already know pretty much all the things that the registry contains.
Big Brother is to know exactly where on your cell phone is moving, I can work out at our place when we open our facebook or Helsingin Sanomat online version of the locals. In addition, he knows all the shopping, q10 where we have shown the S-discount card or other similar spyware q10 purpose made customer card. Big brother's always recorded in the register when paying for plastic money, and so on. When big brother is all of this information already, it is worth to him to lift a finger to know where our car is, after all, he already knows your cell phone is and has been. Cell phone we have with us always, the car we drive only part of the time. And when talking about a mobile phone, big brother know who we are talking about and from where. The car he knows just how the car is moving, but not by whom it is run and who is in the car.
If desired, the mileage tax is to be done so as not to be a big brother to files other indication as how much we drive. That's what he already knows that we pay for refueling plastic money. q10 Ollila mötikän not have to send out any information q10 other than that, how much of the bill we have achieved. If so decided, the system is built in such a way that the car out to go to other information. If it is determined that no other information not collected, not collected, but if it is desired that the accuracy of the bill it is possible to check whether the device can be stored in the runs inside. 16 GB memory stick is already a retail price of less than ten.
Data protection is based on trust between the people, the fact that the contracts entered into are honored. The previous hour, and the basic human nature of knowing is very hard to believe that no abuse of the system.
And when the technology is installed in the car, then is it not just for political q10 decisions depend on how it is decided to take advantage of at any given matter. How do these political decisions can not predict whether or not required at all?
Instead, you or anyone else a politician can not in any way promise that the next Government. For example, information like that is very easy to use when you just made a decision that they do so.
Yeah autoissahan is just excellent way forward to the measuring equipment, mobile apps, and sensors (= VTI Hamlin Oy, Finland), and GPS to not to fall in other posts, but to inform what kilometritaksalla (= Ollillan vyökykkeellä, either rural = 0, or in the city = 1) journey by car to the taxable journey.
Thus, more masts and base stations to nature and to you. Point masts are at home, measure the mass (= in fact, have already q10 WLAN base stations and handsets in the form of) what homes are made, and will be subjected something that could be taxed. Micro-Soft Just for example, live in the homes of many microphones and cameras in the role (ie, Windows, and Linux both provide q10 these methods).
I've been wondering that why you did not raise the green noise that a significant q10 part of the environmental control is going to take away traffic from taxation. Ollila is honestly concerned about the reduced fuel consumption leads to reduced tax revenue. Kyllonen is then less honest, when not talking about dwindling tax revenues, but "environmental control" (though apparently the sense that the amount to be deducted or added).
What is the problem with the current trend, that car consumption is reduced (whether TSI and Ecoboost engines or electric cars), and a new car purchase is taxed, which provide for progressive taxation, as well as the new car was built, the burden of the environment? If the emissions are reduced and the car tax is controlled by the purchase of new cars in low-emission, which brings improvement in the environmental control of shutdown q10 and the new car price slashing, so that the frugal car being charged to tax in kilometers?
Still exclude why the formula "in the statistics the average consumption of" times "annual mileage" is for you eco-taxed, but the tax on gasoline is not it? Is not [N liters / km] * [km]
No comments:
Post a Comment